Arizona and Massachusetts reject tip credit measures
Voters have defeated ballot initiatives that would have changed the minimum wage tip credit in Arizona and Massachusetts.
Published: November 6, 2024 | by Michael Cardman, Senior Legal Editor at Brightmine
Voters have defeated ballot initiatives that would have changed the minimum wage tip credit in Arizona and Massachusetts.
Arizona Proposition 138 — which would have allowed employers to pay employees up to 25% less than the minimum hourly wage if the employer could establish that the employee’s wage plus tips or gratuities is at least $2.00 more than the minimum wage for every hour worked — was roundly rejected by a 25-75 margin, according to unofficial results.
Massachusetts Question 5 — which would have gradually phased out the state’s minimum wage credit by 2029 and also have allowed employers to administer tip pools that distribute tips among all workers — was losing by a 36-64 margin at the time of publication, according to the New York Times (Massachusetts does not publish unofficial results).
In the Seattle suburb of Everett, Washington, Initiative 24-02 – which would have established a local minimum wage of $20.24 per hour for large employers starting in July 1, 2025, and then phased in the minimum wage for smaller employers over the next two years — was defeated by a 41-59 margin, according to unofficial results.
At the time of publication, the race was still too close to call for minimum wage ballot initiatives in Alaska and California. With 76% of votes in, Alaska’s measure had a commanding-but-not-insurmountable lead of 57-43. With 52% of votes in, California’s measure was losing 48-52.
The results suggest that voters may be losing their appetite for minimum wage increases. Before the November 5 election, all but two of the 28 minimum wage increases that have appeared on the ballot since 1996 had been approved.
Get started today
Request a quote today to gain free 7-day access to the Brightmine HR & Compliance Center and stay up to date, compliant and save valuable time.
About the author
Michael Cardman
Senior Legal Editor, Brightmine
Michael Cardman has more than 20 years of experience in publishing and has specialized in employment law for more than 15 years. As a member of the Brightmine editorial team, he focuses on wage and hour compliance, including minimum wage, overtime, employee classification, hours worked, independent contractors and child labor.
Michael holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in English from the University of Virginia. Prior to joining Brightmine, he was the managing editor for Thompson Publishing Group’s library of HR publications. In this role, he was responsible for overseeing books, manuals and online tools covering a variety of topics such as wage and hour, employee leaves, employee benefits and compensation.
Connect with Michael on LinkedIn.